Search for: "Does 1-43" Results 121 - 140 of 4,441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That doesn’t mean that 43(a) couldn’t go beyond classic trademark protection. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Even if a firm does not satisfy either of the factors, it may nevertheless be required to register as a dealer under existing law and precedents. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Elspeth Guild
In any event, responsibility does not require a formal agreement between the controllers as regards the purposes and means of processing (para 44). [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
How does this affect application or development of TM law? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 7:50 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Current doctrines: passing off/false representation/43(a); Indian Arts & Crafts Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 The upshot: so long as a defendant says what the SEC wants to hear (or says nothing at all), he does not violate the No-Admit-No-Deny Provision. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:00 am by Dennis Dimka
Are you interested in getting your firm to the #1 position in Google’s search results? [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
1. difence agst. foreign invasion. 2. agst. internal sedition. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
  The Colorado Supreme Court later held that Colorado Revised Statutes section 1-1-113(1) affords such voters the right to bring such a suit.[1]  (Colorado’s constitution doesn’t impose any “standing” limitations, such as those the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Luna (4th—G062297) Illegal Referrals—Penalties—Application of Williamson Rule—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s dismissal order, held that trial court properly applied Williamson rule ( In re Williamson (1954) 43 Cal. 2d 651, 276 P.2d 593), which precludes criminal prosecution under general statute if there is more specific statute that applies to defendant’s conduct, to dismiss multiple counts of felony insurance fraud filed against defendant… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
During his tenure, the Commission adopted a very significant and impactful regulation — rule 146 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).[1] If rule 146 does not ring a bell, do not worry. [read post]