Search for: "Does 1-72"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,039
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2013, 12:09 am
1. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 6:05 am
IC 24-5-0.5-3(a) has nineteen (yes, 19) different acts that can be a deceptive practice.(1) That such subject of a consumer transaction has sponsorship, approval, performance, characteristics, accessories, uses, or benefits it does not have which the supplier knows or should reasonably know it does not have [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:35 am
Section 12-72 also provides the following definitions for clarification: 1. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:29 am
What does that leave at the felony level? [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
However, he ran into the problem of Section 72 of the above-mentioned Act. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
The basics with respect to placing an employee on ordinary disability leave pursuant to §72 of the Civil Service Law* involuntarily, except where the appointing authority determines that the individual's continued presence at the job site constitutes a danger to the individual or to his or her coworkers or agency clients within the meaning of §72.5 of the Civil Service Law, are as follows:1. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
The basics with respect to placing an employee on ordinary disability leave pursuant to §72 of the Civil Service Law* involuntarily, except where the appointing authority determines that the individual's continued presence at the job site constitutes a danger to the individual or to his or her coworkers or agency clients within the meaning of §72.5 of the Civil Service Law, are as follows:1. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:06 am
Kali Singh [(1977) 1 SCC 57], Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
We conclude that: (1) Newman v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm
HTH Corp., 133 Hawai‘i 1, 14, 323 P.3d 792, 805 (2014). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:13 am
The Rogers test prevents a finding of infringement if this use is artistically relevant to the underlying work and does not explicitly mislead consumers as to the source or content of the work. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:40 am
Does the new law apply to us seniors at all and if so, how?" [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:00 am
Although it was procedurally unconscionable (slip op. at 12-13), the delegation clause was not substantively unconscionable because it "is not overly harsh, and does not sanction one-sided results. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:58 am
During prosecution the Examiner rejected the application as obvious in light of two references: 1) WO96/32852, Gross et al.; and 2) U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:13 pm
Khalaf, 58 N.J. 63, 71-72 (1971); Patetta, supra, 358 N.J. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 8:48 am
When Does Paid Sick Leave Accrual Begin? [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:09 pm
Within those proposals, instead of rushing to a July 1, 2016 implementation date of the previously adopted San Francisco-like 72-hour sick leave cap, the Council has decided that everyone should just chill out. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:47 am
The Plaintiff relied on the contrasting provision in the UK, namely section 72(1) of the UK Patents Act 1977 (c.37), which expressly provides that the power to revoke a patent is enjoyed by both the court and the comptroller, the UK equivalent of the Registrar. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 am
§72(t)(1), (2)(A)(v). [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 6:03 am
But for those with less severe cases, the procedure may be put off for 48 to 72 hours. [read post]
