Search for: "Does 1-84" Results 121 - 140 of 2,374
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2017, 2:32 am by Romano Beitsma
However, the Board raised several objections under Articles 123(2) and 84 EPC.The Board also drew the appellant's attention to the following document:[...]VII. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this appeal the Board examined the inventive step of claim 1 of the main request, which read:1. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:04 pm
If you are traveling by car this summer and want to keep both you and your pet safe, be sure to: 1) Put your pet in a carrier. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Nor is such a lack of clear definition necessarily a matter for objection under A 84 only. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
There was no automatic right to such an investigation whenever a member of the armed forces died on active service [para 84]. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  The attorney advises her to bring a Workers' Compensation Claim, and does so for her. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 6:17 am by David Markus
Back in 1983-84, Tim Kaine clerked for Judge Lanier Anderson. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The Board thus concludes that the parameter “mean aspect ratio” is unclear and that claim 1 does not comply with the requirements of A 84 EPC 1973. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:21 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Since the board does not intend to refuse the application according to the appellant's request, oral proceedings are not necessary. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Very often, this lack of a precise definition corresponds to a lack of clarity (A 84).[1.11] In the present case the situation is different, because it is one of the starting products that is insufficiently defined. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As exemplified for instance by figure 3 of the application, the connection can be performed via other spiral coils, two in that case, so the connection does not need to be direct.Contrary to the appellant’s opinion, claim 1 cannot be regarded as being limited to the embodiments of the description (first and third coils attached to each other using one pintle as in figure 2 or using only two additional spiral coils as in figure 3). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 6:47 pm
Doe, 538 U.S. 84 (2003); and 2) there was no constitutional notice issue due to the defendant's claim that he was unaware that he was required to register under SORNA. [read post]