Search for: "Does I & II"
Results 121 - 140
of 23,529
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2008, 12:04 pm
But this does not always happen. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 am
It does not resolve questions about the Establishment Clause, but as I explained in March, this provision does not apply in the immigration context; in the nine months since I laid out this argument, no one has responded to it. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 10:36 am
In many cases. challenging the determination of inadmissibility is the only option because the foreign national is either not eligible for a waiver or the law does not offer a waiver. 212(a)(6)(C)(ii) In general. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:23 pm
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during August 2023 (II) Fourteen consistory court judgments were circulated in August and the five featured in the first part of the round-up all relate to Reordering, extensions and other building works. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 12:50 pm
INA Sections 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(II) set terms of the bans resulting from unlawful presence. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:25 pm
and(ii) What is the substantive standard for who may be indefinitely detained? [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:45 am
Fortunately, FINRA does provide an arbitration forum for investors to resolve such disputes. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
As I've explained before, the problem with denying class certification in post-Prop. 64 UCL actions because of lack of reliance by unnamed class members is that, as the Supreme Court confirmed in Tobacco II, the unnamed class members need not establish reliance (or, for that matter, deception or injury). [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 7:05 am
This is Part II of a review of recent social media ownership disputes. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm
Why did the Tam Court not feel compelled to explain how and why the government actions of approving or disapproving marks for registration somehow does not take the form of speech? [read post]
24 May 2011, 1:38 pm
As I said before, insurance is a financial safety net. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:39 am
The FDA regulates these devices by classifying the devices into one of three classes (I, II, or III) based on the risks posed by the device and the regulatory controls necessary to ensure safety to patients. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:23 am
The Court does its best to circumvent the reliance questions it raised in Cohen by citing Tobacco II for the contention that there is a limited area under the UCL where reliance can be an element of the claim, followed by a finding that the record contains admissions of absolutely no reliance. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
In their Reply brief, petitioners say Article I (governing congressional elections) and Article II (concerning presidential elections) feature the same operative text. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 1:01 pm
” What can I do today to check that I’m complying with the law? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:08 pm
Similarly, the SOC 1 comes in the same Type I and Type II varieties. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm
II. [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:17 pm
i) What are the two most likely sections of Rule 23 that would be used to deny class certification in this case? [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 2:21 pm
In essence, what matters is that the act (i) is performed by an individual person (ii) directly or indirectly has the distinct effect of addressing the public, irrespective of the tool used by the individual, and (iii) concerns subject matter protected by copyright or related rights. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:45 pm
Bush and it hangs on the wall of the home I grew up in. [read post]
