Search for: "Doyle v. Doyle"
Results 121 - 140
of 692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2020, 1:14 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
Herman, Legislative Attorney; Charles Doyle, Senior Specialist in American Public Law. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
The law does not require the same degree of proof to hold a defendant for action of the Grand Jury as is demanded for conviction; however, the proof must be sufficient on its face to sustain conviction of the defendant akin to People v Eckert and People v Donahue. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Mori v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:08 am
So I was very interested when I read about Vinluan v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 7:24 am
Michael Doyle of the McClatchy-Tribune, for one, comments that the Court has saved its "starkest drama" for the second half of the Term. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 1:07 am
Doyle, — N.Y.S.2d —-, 2009 WL 93065 (Appellate Division, 2nd Department, January 13, 2009). [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 5:58 am
, v USA Cable, 2004 U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 12:57 am
Although the courts have acknowledged in Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate that Sherlock Holmes as a character is protectable (within the relevant term), the extent of "roundedness" that could extend outside of the term is very debatable. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:39 pm
Doyle appealed, and Ms. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:12 pm
Today the US Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit issued its decision in Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate, in which upheld the decision of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois - Eastern Division that Mr Klinger was free to use material in the 50 Sherlock Holmes stories and novels that are no longer protected by copyright. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:08 am
Facts: This case (Howard et al v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 7:36 pm
Doyle, 60 A.D.3d 237, 873 N.Y.S.2d 72. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 9:12 am
E Group PLLC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:46 am
Doyle v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:33 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 2:46 pm
It's only now that this Kat has caught up with Unilever Plc v Société des Produits Nestlé SA, a decision of Dermot Doyle, on behalf of the Controller of the Irish Patents Office which dates back to 12 September. [read post]
