Search for: "Dozier Internet Law"
Results 121 - 137
of 137
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2008, 8:26 am
Here's the attorney's description of the case: In September 2007, Dozier Internet Law . . . was targeted online by "free speech" and "public participation" interests for asserting copyright ownership rights in a confidential cease and desist letter sent to a "scam reporting site". . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 9:03 pm
(TechDirt, Jan. 25; Slashdot, Jan. 26; Dozier Internet Law press release, PRWeb, Jan. 24). [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
A new service, according to Ron Miller and Evan Schaeffer, tries to assist.And finally:David Maister hosts Blawg Review #131;Blawg Review hosts Carnival of the Capitalists #211, the longest continuing floating carnival in existence;Insurance and law meet up in the Cavalcade of Risk, at Hill's Personal Finance; Anne Reed has a very scary post about how we pick politicians by the look on their faces, and that has ramifications for jury selection;Scott Greenfield follows up on the ironic… [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 6:46 am
None other than Dozier Internet Law, criticized in this space and many others last week over its claim that its nastygrams are themselves the subject of copyright and cannot be posted on the web. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 6:19 pm
The Dozier Internet Law Firm came in for recent criticism of copyright mis-use when claiming that posting of its cease and desist letters were barred by copyright. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 6:19 am
Inventor-link is represented by Dozier Internet Law -- the same law firm that threatened to sue for copyright infringement if one of its demand letters were posted on the Internet. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 5:14 am
He discusses a unique warning letter by the Dozier internet Law firm, and the potential legal malpractice consequences. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:06 pm
Ted has briefly mentioned (Oct. 8) the recent doings of an outfit called Dozier Internet Law, whose cease and desist letter to a consumer-complaint site not only demanded that the site take down certain statements about Dozier's client, DirectBuy, but also asserted that the cease and desist letter was itself the subject of copyright and could not be posted in part or full on the web. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:19 pm
Our post about Dozier Internet Law's cease-and-desist letter to a consumer-review site, which threatened a copyright infringement claim if the letter were posted on the Internet, generated a lot of commentary on this blog and around the blogosphere (see for example here, here, here, here, and here). [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 1:05 pm
Here is a link to an account of a cease and desist letter written by Donald Morris of a firm called Dozier Internet Law. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
In my Friday round-up I briefly wrote about the lame attempt of the Dozier law firm to claim copyright infringement if any part of their cease and desist letter was published. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:05 am
In my Friday round-up I briefly wrote about the lame attempt of the Dozier law firm to claim copyright infringement if any part of their cease and desist letter was published. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 2:31 am
They asked for it.Some lawyer at an outfit calling itself Dozier Internet Law sent a cease and desist letter on behalf of one of its clients, along with this threat:Please be aware that this letter is copyrighted by our law firm, and you are not authorized to republish this in any matter. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 2:31 am
They asked for it.Some lawyer at an outfit calling itself Dozier Internet Law sent a cease and desist letter on behalf of one of its clients, along with this threat:Please be aware that this letter is copyrighted by our law firm, and you are not authorized to republish this in any matter. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 11:07 am
The company's law firm, Dozier Internet Law (which specializes, among other things, in using copyright law to "get websites pulled down without notice") sent a strongly worded demand letter to the owner of InfomercialScams.com, claiming that consumer complaints on the website are defamatory because they refer to the company's direct-buy plan as a "scam" and a "nightmare. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
says Public Citizen, which tells Dozier Internet Law, P.C to stick it where the sun don't shine. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
Internet Cases Evan Brown writes the content for Internet Cases, a blog highlighting internet/technology-related legal news. [read post]
