Search for: "Dr. Reddy"
Results 121 - 140
of 395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2018, 7:27 am
Dr. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm
Dr. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:56 am
Reddy’s and Teva by Genzyme and Sanofi resulted in a decision for the plaintiffs. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:30 am
Hat Tip: Big thanks to Dr. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 5:57 pm
Dr. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:15 am
Reddy’s, Zydus, Cipla, and Lotus Pharmaceutical. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:15 am
Reddy’s, Zydus, Cipla, and Lotus Pharmaceutical. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 5:56 am
Eibhlin explains the recent Patents Court decision of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (2) Sandoz Limited (and Ohers) [2017] EWHC 1433 (Pat) which provided guidance on the issue.In memoriam of June Foray: the greatest screen voice whom you probably never heard of, but likely heardNeil pays homage to June Foray, the voice behind a portfolio of character’s such as Lucifer the cat from Cinderella, Jokey Smurf, Mrs. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:14 pm
The money KatThe recent interim Patents Court decision of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (2) Sandoz Limited (and Ohers) [2017] EWHC 1433 (Pat) provides guidance on the issue. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 2:15 am
Reddy’s Laboratories as well as... [read post]
31 May 2017, 12:35 pm
I also accept Dr. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:56 am
Reddy’s Laboratories (UK) v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
De minimis and Quia Timet injunctions Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) provides a useful summary of the law relating to the application of the de minimis principle and of the interplay between de minimis and quia timet injunctions. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 2:58 pm
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in passing off cup case |… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 9:10 am
Sandoz focussed on “proportionality” and in particular the importance of the Court including consideration of “whether the injunction was proportionate and a legitimate barrier to trade”, citing Napp v Dr Reddy’s [2016] EWHC 1517 (Pat) and C-494/15 Tommy Hilfiger. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in passing off cup case |… [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:44 am
| Negative decision for anti-HIV therapy patent: Merck Sharpe & Dohme v Shionogi Co Limited | Book review: Copyright and E-Learning | Friday Fantasies | Fontem see their patent “vaporised” – the dangers of added matter | BREAKING: Antidote found for poisonous priorities | Around the IP blogs | AIPPI Congress Report 5: Antitrust and Pharma - seeking a balance | When the Rolling Stones visited 2120 South Michigan Avenue in Chicago | No measure of success in passing off cup case |… [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:00 pm
Copyright scholars, sociologists and lawyers will find useful the interdisciplinary analysis of graffiti, from a legal, historical and sociological points of view.Mr Justice Carr's decision in Victoria Plumb is about Adwords (honest)Jeremy Blum and Andrew Butcher discuss Victoria Plum Limited v Victorian Plumbing Ltd, [2016] EWHC 2911 (Ch), involving trademark infringement, honest concurrent use defense and passing off in the context of Pay per Click (PPC) bidding on keywords.PREVIOUSLY ON… [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 8:03 am
The terms of the settlement required Dr. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
