Search for: "Du Pont v. Du Pont"
Results 121 - 140
of 568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2015, 4:10 am
., Limited v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:20 am
” The Board therefore concluded that the second and third du Pont factors favored the USPTO.Similarity of the marks/commercial impression: Citing the Federal Circuit’s decision in Stone Lion Capital Partners v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:36 am
Ass’n of U.S., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
QuikTrip West, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:26 am
Kate Spade LLC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 2:20 am
Durrset Amigos, Ltd. d/b/a Amigos Foods v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 2:42 am
See Octocom Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:23 am
The Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:47 am
Chatam International Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
" Zillow, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 6:23 am
Du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:05 am
"Therefore, the second du Pont factor weighed in favor of Applicant.As to the marks, the Board found them dissimilar in connotation and overall commercial impression. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:10 pm
Kennedy died, Du Pont paid the proceeds of the SIP, which was about $400,000 to his ex-wife. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:03 am
Thus this du Pont factor favored Plaintiff. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 2:54 pm
Here a single du Pont factor is dispositive, outweighing the other factors. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 4:11 am
" Allergan, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
" Playboy Enterprises International, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:30 pm
Both of these du Pont factors favored finding a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:36 am
”Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found confusion likely and it granted the petition to cancel. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
" The Section 2(d) test is the same: the du Pont analysis, applied from the standpoint of the users of the certification mark. [read post]
