Search for: "Duke v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 121 - 140
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 3:29 pm
See Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, No. 551 EAL 2011 (Penn. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
Following the lead of the California Supreme Court’s decision in Arias v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:13 pm
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
Duke Energy International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 2:46 am
And, in doing so, the panel explains how plaintiffs may still seek monetary damages under Rule 23(b)(2) after Dukes. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:39 am
Supreme Court has held in a widely respected opinion, NCAA v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:01 pm
In Wang v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm
One year later, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:16 am
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 53 Cal.4th 1004 (2012) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:52 am
Arguably, it is inconsistent with the prohibition on Trial by Formula discussed in Dukes v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:24 pm
But the court went on to say that under Dukes the class would have failed “commonality” for these same reasons. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:39 am
Recall that in Wasek v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:42 am
Oncale v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:50 am
Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
16 May 2012, 11:38 am
On May 10, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Nader v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:24 am
Circuit, Scott Silliman of Duke, and Judge Royce Lamberth. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:04 pm
In the past the Pennsylvania Superior Court has expressly looked first to the Delaware Supreme Court where they “[did] not find any Pennsylvania cases addressing this situation” in corporate law. [read post]
