Search for: "Employees' Retirement System of the City of Providence"
Results 121 - 140
of 943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2011, 5:34 am
In City of Pontiac General Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
"At a trial on a State HRL claim, the plaintiff employee still bears the burden of proving the existence of a reasonable accommodation that would have enabled the employee to perform the essential functions of his or her position" (Jacobsen v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:02 pm
"At a trial on a State HRL claim, the plaintiff employee still bears the burden of proving the existence of a reasonable accommodation that would have enabled the employee to perform the essential functions of his or her position" (Jacobsen v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 11:21 am
In voiding this provision as illegal, the lower court relied upon the language in the Home Rule Charter Law, which provides as follows: a municipality shall not “[b]e authorized to diminish the rights or privileges of any former municipal employee entitled to benefit or any present municipality employee in his pension or retirement system. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:30 pm
But there is also a systemic problem – other than the corruption that bedecks the public officials. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:14 am
The City of Pittsburgh is preparing to approve a 1% tuition tax on students attending college in that city. the tax would raise about $16 million and, in a a classic public choice move of identifying "winners" in order to garner political support, the tax is initially earmarked to pay pensions for retired city employees. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 12:02 pm
Board of Administration of the San Diego City Employees’ Retirement System, et. al.) [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:11 am
* Public Authorities Law §1203-a, in pertinent part, provides: "[MaBSTOA] officers and employees shall not become, for any purpose, employees of the city or of the [TA] and shall not acquire civil service status or become members of the New York City Employees' Retirement System" (NYCERS). [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Shortly after commencing their employment with the City of New York, the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] placed the petitioners [Members] in this CPLR Article 78 action in the Basic Tier 4, 62/5 Retirement Plan [the 62/5 plan] which provided for retirement with full benefits at age 62 after at least 5 years of credited member service. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Shortly after commencing their employment with the City of New York, the New York City Employees' Retirement System [NYCERS] placed the petitioners [Members] in this CPLR Article 78 action in the Basic Tier 4, 62/5 Retirement Plan [the 62/5 plan] which provided for retirement with full benefits at age 62 after at least 5 years of credited member service. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am
It is in essence a benefit delivery system, providing lost wages and medical coverage for those who need it when dealing with a work related injury. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 5:48 am
Management, directors, and environmental VPs and managers must understand the importance of integrating the new employees and facilities immediately into the acquirer's EHS management system and to ensure that no tolerance was provided for deviation. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Circuit issues major decision holding health benefits for future retirees is a mandatory subjectDeferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationDenial of a “materially more advantageous” position may constitute an adverse employment action for the purposes of Title VIIDesignation of a disciplinary hearing officerDisciplinary action claimed filed with maliceDisciplinary dismissal not discriminationDisciplinary penalty of termination vacated as “shocking… [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:23 am
Circuit issues major decision holding health benefits for future retirees is a mandatory subjectDeferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationDenial of a “materially more advantageous” position may constitute an adverse employment action for the purposes of Title VIIDesignation of a disciplinary hearing officerDisciplinary action claimed filed with maliceDisciplinary dismissal not discriminationDisciplinary penalty of termination vacated as “shocking… [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Circuit issues major decision holding health benefits for future retirees is a mandatory subjectDeferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationDenial of a “materially more advantageous” position may constitute an adverse employment action for the purposes of Title VIIDesignation of a disciplinary hearing officerDisciplinary action claimed filed with maliceDisciplinary dismissal not discriminationDisciplinary penalty of termination vacated as “shocking… [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:23 am
Circuit issues major decision holding health benefits for future retirees is a mandatory subjectDeferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationDenial of a “materially more advantageous” position may constitute an adverse employment action for the purposes of Title VIIDesignation of a disciplinary hearing officerDisciplinary action claimed filed with maliceDisciplinary dismissal not discriminationDisciplinary penalty of termination vacated as “shocking… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 5:55 am
Circuit issues major decision holding health benefits for future retirees is a mandatory subjectDeferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationDenial of a “materially more advantageous” position may constitute an adverse employment action for the purposes of Title VIIDesignation of a disciplinary hearing officerDisciplinary action claimed filed with maliceDisciplinary dismissal not discriminationDisciplinary penalty of termination vacated as “shocking… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 5:55 am
Circuit issues major decision holding health benefits for future retirees is a mandatory subjectDeferring imposing a disciplinary penalty equivalent to disciplinary probationDenial of a “materially more advantageous” position may constitute an adverse employment action for the purposes of Title VIIDesignation of a disciplinary hearing officerDisciplinary action claimed filed with maliceDisciplinary dismissal not discriminationDisciplinary penalty of termination vacated as “shocking… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:38 am
A number of California transit agencies, as well as cities and counties that operate and maintain transit systems, are in legal limbo over whether the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (“PEPRA”) applies to mass transit employees. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 10:47 am
By the majority’s language, if the city of Springfield enacted an ordinance giving an honorary plaque to each retiree upon retirement, that benefit would “flow from” membership in the system and could never be terminated. [read post]
