Search for: "English v. Industrial Commission"
Results 121 - 140
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2018, 7:05 am
Canada (Attorney General) Fair Dealing Support for News Reporting and Public Debate: The Case of Warman and National Post v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:16 pm
I had earlier circulated information about the marvelous conference “变化世界中的公司”2018 年国际学术研讨会--2018 International Symposium on The Corporation in a Changing World, including the program and participant lists in 中国语文 and English (HERE).I was delighted to be part of this event that considered a range of corporate law related issues from a… [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
In El Chico v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
The reporting (in English) of the ceremony and the English translation of the 100 commitments follows with thanks to the Pressenza International News Agency which posted originally.The most interesting part of the speech--and its most revealing, is the reference to Benito Juarez's dictum: “con el pueblo todo, sin el pueblo nada” ["with the people everything, without the people nothing"]. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
For example, the University of Guelph told the Industry committee that 24 per cent of materials in their course management systems consisted of open or free online content. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 3:36 pm
Did Unwired Planet need to first comply with the Huawei v ZTE steps? [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
This event will be in Russian with an English translation. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:43 am
Huawei relied upon the European Commission's decision in Motorola[1], in which the Commission decided that Apple's offer of a German-only licence was FRAND. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
Reliance Industries Ltd. (2015) 10 SCC 213 (Reliance II)(Para 18).In IMAX Corporation (2017) 5 SCC 331, the Supreme Court held that the parties chose ICC arbitration and left the choice of seat to the ICC, which consulted the parties and chose ICC as the seat. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The French data regulator the Commission Nationale de I’Informatique et des Libertes has made the request for a preliminary ruling on the matter which concerns jurisdictional and technical domain name issues arising from national extensions. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Selim v NYC Transit Authority, 220 AD2d 515]Terminating an employee for failing to turn in his keys when ordered. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
It summarizes the existing scholarship on the interaction between legal media, legal reasoning and substantive law, much of which derives from the American and, to a lesser extent, English legal experiences, and applies this scholarship to the Canadian context. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Why is this important to the energy industry? [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:56 am
However, the circumstances in that case were unique as the Court relied on a prior English High Court ruling on the same issue between the same parties. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 4:19 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The European Parliament has issued a non-binding resolution to the EU Commission to suspend the EU-US privacy shield. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has considered the implementation of the English Courts modernisation. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Image credits: Sleepwalking - GIPHYAmsterdam - Shovy Rahman PREVIOUSLY ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 194 [weeks ending 13th and 20th May] Important amendments under Mexican law regarding patents, utility models and industrial designs | Decoding the Scope of Patent Protection: Singapore after Eli Lilly v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:05 pm
The Oxford English Dictionary definition of ‘must’ is: Be obliged to; should (expressing necessity): e.g. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
For example, similar rights already existed under English law as a result of s13 DPA 1998 (which afforded data subjects a right to bring direct claims against a data controller for losses caused by a breach of DPA 1998)—this right was interpreted broadly by the English courts as including a right to compensation for non-pecuniary losses of the type contemplated by GDPR (see Vidal-Hall v Google). [read post]
