Search for: "Estate of Kennedy v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2011, 8:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit reiterated this point in Jackman Financial Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
By virtue of a 2003 ruling of the state’s highest court, in Goodridge v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 9:00 am by Stephen Wermiel
United States, Gorsuch defended the court’s decision to send a case back to the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am by JURIST Staff
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:58 pm by Amy Howe
  The Justices did not make us wait:  the first opinion of the day came in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
United States is cited in the following article: Anna Roberts, Arrests as Guilt, 70 Ala. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:25 am by Charles Roth
United States (full disclosure — I was on the Chaidez team), the court found Padilla non-retroactive. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am by Podhurst Orseck
The high court in in 2012 dismissed as “improvidently granted review” First American v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kennedy, of course, was the author of the Citizens United case last year, with its equally stunning reach. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order for raisins requires raisin growers in certain years to give percentage of their crop to the government, free of charge. [read post]