Search for: "Evans v. Marks"
Results 121 - 140
of 565
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm
A basic mistake, it must be said.Once the test had been cleared up by Judge Malan (in the process approving Sabel V Puma's global appreciation test and the oft quoted South Africa judgements of Plascon Evans and Cowbell) he went about analysing whether confusion was likely in circumstances where the notional consumer in a specialist market for prescription drugs was argued to be less likely to be confused - Cipla had all but conceded that a likelihood of confusion… [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
Abassi and Hasty v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Rogozinski v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:49 pm
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:10 am
"In Billy James Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
Mark Sherman also reported on the oral argument for the Associated Press, as Lyle Denniston did for this blog on Tuesday. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Mark L. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:20 am
Read Evan’s other blog, UDRP Tracker, for information about domain name disputes. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
The 43-minute documentary My Native Air: Charles Evans Hughes and the Adirondacks is now available on YouTube. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
The Court also considered but distinguished the South African case of Plascon-Evans Paints (TVL) Ltd. v Van Riebeck Paints (Pty) Ltd, 1984 (3) SA 623, relating to the marks MICATEX and MIKACOTE in which the two marks were found to be similar and likely to cause confusion. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
In the latter case, as just noted, trade mark rights would be in play and further it might be possible for the photographer to make use of the photographs with the trade mark removed or edited out (although this Kat is a little uncomfortable with that idea, and feels it would very much depend on the photograph and how the mark was redacted).The judge then went on to note the need to take a minimalist approach in implying copyright licences: starting with a bare licence,… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:30 pm
” In light of the Chief Justice Roberts's opinion in King v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:45 am
Young, Mark J. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:09 pm
Hurley, Mark R. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Evan Perigoe of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm
Evan Perigoe of counsel), for appellant. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:10 am
In a transparent effort to evade the contractual forum selection clause that he acknowledges binds him, Brian Evans has enlisted the aid of his colleague, Mark Biltz, to stand in his shoes as Plaintiff. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Rev. 567 (2008) Mark A. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Still, the two constructs were the tools they had to get themselves there, and they had to be used in certain ways or else appear to pass–in Mark’s words–”from lawyerly deliberation to sheer willfulness” (to quote Mark’s rendering of Harlan Fiske Stone’s verdict on Colgate v. [read post]
