Search for: "Evans v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2022, 5:36 pm
(Basu v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Some time ago, I reported on Crowell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:28 am
In Lummis v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:01 pm
United States (Partition Trust Land; Administrative Procedures Act) United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:43 am
The case is Evans v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:00 pm
This brief is well done (Carter Phillips/Evan Caminker) but also important in that it represents the views of Chief Justices of states from across the political spectrum. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
Johnson County CC * Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am
Here is the abstract: In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant,… [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:25 am
In Justin Mayhew v (1) Philip King (2) Milbank Trucks Ltd (Defendants) & Chaucer Insurance plc (Third Party and Part 20 Claimant) v Towergate Stafford Knight Company Limited & Ors Sir Edward Evans-Lombe held that a term of a settlement agreement which stated that a right to an indemnity would cease if the party with the benefit of the indemnity went into administration was contrary to the anti-deprivation principle and would be struck out.The claimant,… [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the FOIA 2000, s 53, does not permit the Attorney General to override the decision of a judicial tribunal or Court by issuing a certificate merely because he, considering the same facts and arguments, takes a different view from that taken by the tribunal or Court. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 5:37 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:04 am
Evans had been disclosed as an expert in 179 cases in 23 different states and in 96% of those cases he offered testimony on behalf of the plaintiff. [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:10 pm
In People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 12:49 pm
Evans v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:58 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued an order in the case Thorogood v. [read post]
