Search for: "Ex Parte Branch" Results 121 - 140 of 896
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
  That’s part of why Section 3 was a failure the first time around—the real lesson of the Amnesty Act of 1872. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 2:01 pm by Eric Biber
  All three of these branches are units of the federal government, and can be understood as part of what is called “vertical federalism”: The creation of a central government for our federal system of government. [read post]
27 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ethics Law Offers Possible Path for Trump Prosecution Yahoo News – Rebecca Beitsch (The Hill) | Published: 5/24/2022 The Hatch Act prohibits electioneering by executive branch officials, including the promotion of the president’s political interests, during their formal duties. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:42 am by Eugene Volokh
" In particular, the right to public access "protects the public's ability to oversee and monitor the workings of the Judicial Branch," and "promotes the institutional integrity of the Judicial Branch. [read post]
17 May 2022, 3:38 am by Jan von Hein
Unfortunately, the interpretation of the term “branch” by the Court is not convincing. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The lawsuit, which Trump initially filed last year along with suits targeting Google and Facebook, was viewed as part of a broader strategy to appeal to conservatives who have long argued social media companies unfairly censor their viewpoints. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
There is a strong presumption against the sealing of judicial records The right to public access "protects the public's ability to oversee and monitor the workings of the Judicial Branch," and "promotes the institutional integrity of the Judicial Branch. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm by Mark Graber
  Neither the participants in the debate over the Civil Rights Act of 1875 nor the justices that decided Ex parte Virginia thought the rules for implementing Section 1 differed from Section 3. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:54 am by Michel Paradis
Supreme Court precedent leaves no room for doubt that a jurisdictional element of a criminal offense relating to the nationality of the perpetrator is no less a part of the “definition” of a crime than any other element of the offense. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm by Ronald Collins
In the end, though, a large part of the story turned on the question of just what it was that enabled Harlan to see the law so differently from his peers. [read post]
She held that the Lesson Plan conflicted with the Immigration and Nationality Act, and because the unlawful parts could not be severed from the rest of the document, the Lesson Plan was vacated and the matter remanded to the agency. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Already several ex-Trump lawyers have found themselves subject to state bar reviews. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Alden Abbott
U.S. antitrust policy seeks to promote vigorous marketplace competition in order to enhance consumer welfare. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Marguerite Trussler’s office put forward a number of recommendations for changes to the Alberta Lobbyists Act as part of a review of the legislation currently underway. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  It is, therefore, often quite hard to determine their true sustainability ex ante. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The decision was widely expected after the court declined Trump’s request to block the National Archives and Records Administration from turning over executive-branch documents to the congressional committee investigating the Capitol riot. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:16 am by David M. Driesen
The court did this not only in Youngstown but also in Ex Parte Milligan, when the court recognized that “wicked men, ambitious of power, with hatred of liberty and law” could become president. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Sovereign immunity shielded the state itself, and Texas plausibly argued that there was no enforcing official to sue under Ex parte Young. [read post]