Search for: "Ex Parte Hing" Results 121 - 140 of 166
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 7:52 am
" In the case of Revel, the CCJP likely found him to have violated Section 3(B)(7) of the CCJE which does not allow a judge to "initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding... [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 3:53 pm by Mandelman
 For example, the only thing I found at all shocking upon learning that Newt Gingrich had asked his now ex-wife if they could have an “open marriage,” was that there were more than two women (or even one gay man), that would even consider having sex with Newt. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:04 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
“A lot” of the Justice Department’s criminal investigations “hinge on disclosure. . . . [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 6:37 am by Joe Palazzolo
“A lot” of the Justice Department’s criminal investigations “hinge on disclosure. . . . [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm by Mark Bennett
Here the CCA drops a footnote to Ex Parte Kopecky, which cites Justice Rehnquist’s dissent in Whalen v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm by Mark Bennett
Here the CCA drops a footnote to Ex Parte Kopecky, which cites Justice Rehnquist’s dissent in Whalen v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:44 am by Jeralyn
The transcript of the two-hour recorded meeting in Thailand is available here (part 1) and here (part 2.) [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
An expanded panel of the BPAI affirmed the rejection (Ex Parte Staats) characterizing the issue in dispute as: This is a case of first impression. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Thereafter, the appellant pursued ex parte reexamination on some of the very same art previously considered. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:41 am by South Florida Lawyers
This motion to vacate was filed ex-parte under Wingate’s questionable theory that, as Redfield had not been served with the first filed complaint, Redfield was not required to have notice of this hearing, even though it was a party to the second filed identical complaint.Come on! [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Becton, Dickinson et al (CAFC 2008-1511, 1512, -1513, -1514, 1595) precedential; en banc; opinion by Chief Judge Rader, joined in full by Newman, Lourie, Linn, Moore, and Reyna; O'Malley dissents-in-part; dissent by: Bryson (author), Gajarsa, Dyk, and Prost Prosecution backdrop - Abbott filed the original application leading to the '551 patent in 1984. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
This is one of a series of posts that will excerpt sections from the third edition of my book, Day on Torts: Leading Tennessee Tort Cases. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:14 am
(Ex parte i2 Technologies, Decision on Appeal, Decision on Rehearing.) [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
This is one of a series of posts that will excerpt sections from the third edition of my book, Day on Torts: Leading Tennessee Tort Cases. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
" Infringement hinged on the use of an algorithmic technique. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 2:29 pm by Orin Kerr
I see Herring as a relatively routine application of that principle: Herring weighs the costs and benefits of an exclusionary rule over the general category of arrests made as a result of merely negligent errors in police databases.Of course, the tricky part of this programmatic weighing is that it’s never really clear ex ante what the category should be over which the costs and benefits must be measured. [read post]