Search for: "Ex parte Birmingham"
Results 121 - 130
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
A Bloomberg campaign spokesperson said the aides were paid more during the campaign to account for the higher tax burden, though not all the ex-aides said they were aware of the arrangement at the time. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
This letter said, in part:1. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:28 am
This letter said, in part:1. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 7:29 pm
This is very abnormal as ex-U.S. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:32 am
This is very abnormal as ex-U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
Leaving terms open for future agreement: Nutraceuticals v Mucos Pharma (The IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO launches patent prosecution highway to Finland (Managing Intellectual Property) Did you know... that all counterclaims asserted in section 337 cases are automatically removed to US District Court (ITC 337 Law Blog) Recent developments under section 337 of the Tariff Act (International Law Office) United Inventors Association patent to market mini-series: episode 1 ‘How… [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am
The defendant declined to take part in any of the proceedings. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:20 am
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Decisions of the Administrative Review Board February 2015 See Case summaries: International Assoc. of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, ARB No. 13-086 (ARB Feb. 27, 2015) Final Decision and Order PDF Summary: The ARB summarily affirmed the Principal Deputy Administrator’s determination that the Employer did not violation the Service Contract Act by refusing to promote workers employed as flight service specialists and pay a higher wage. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
King's Letter From Birmingham Jail (pdf):"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.We are caught in an inescapable networkof mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny.Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Attorneys for the Birmingham and Huntsville airport authorities told the Ethics Commission that airport workers are not public employees because they are paid with funds generated by the airports, not with state, county, or municipal funds. [read post]
