Search for: "FCA US LLC v. A" Results 121 - 140 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 3:56 am
Related posts:Forum non conveniens, anti-suit injunctions, and concurrent US and Australian copyright proceedings In TS Production LLC v Drew Pictures Pty Ltd [2008]...A short but interesting Australian case Armacel Pty Ltd v Smurfit Stone Container Corporation [2008] FCA...Analysis of Non-Exclusive Jurisdiction Agreement by Ontario Court In Sugar v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:53 am by Barry Sookman
See, for example, Trkulja v Google Inc LLC (No 5) [2012] VSC 533 (summarized here), Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 (summarized here), Dr Yeung Sau Shing Albert v Google Inc [2014] HKCFI 1404, A v Google New Zealand Ltd [2012] NZHC 2352, Rana v Google Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 60, Bleyer v Google Inc LLC [2014] NSWSC 897. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:14 am
.* Santa Claus’s submission on the IPO Consultation on Transitional Arrangements for the Repeal of Section 52Jani writes on Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited (No 5) [2015] FCA 1437, an Australian case regarding disclosure of details pertaining to individuals who had shared the film Dallas Buyers Club [see an earlier Katpost here].* IP HairballsEnjoy this IPKat Exclusive (powered by Nicola): IP Whose Hair is it Anyway? [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 4:16 am by Barry Sookman
Yesterday, the Federal Court of Appeal released its reasons in the Bell Canada v Adam Lackman dba TVADDONS.AG 2018 FCA 42 case. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Stremicks Heritage Foods LLC (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas: Delay seeking transfer of venue trumps other convenience factors: eTool Development, Inc. et al v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP finance)   Australia Trade mark use: We need a more balanced solution – FCA decision in Alcon v Bausch & Lomb (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCA on trade marks as security for costs: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (ipwars) Minister for Innovation decides not to change regulatory regime for books – publishers keep territorial exclusivity (LawFont) (Managing Intellectual Property) Non-English language… [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
”The Judge accordingly referred to his own judgment in Lilly Icos LLC v 8PM Chemists Ltd [2009] EWHC 1905 (Ch), where he had noted (at [287] thereof) that:“…the court will not award compensation under a cross-undertaking for the loss sustained by an unlawful business or where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking has to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:01 am
Due to the case's potential impact now and in the future for any online infringers, Justice Perram's inquiries into the content of the letter being sent to infringers and into sought damages were very important.In Dallas Buyers Club LLC v iiNet Limited (No 5) [2015] FCA 1437 the claimant, seeking the disclosure of the details pertaining to individuals who had shared the movie Dallas Buyers Club in Australia, had to present specific information as to the… [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Segin Software, LLC (PTAB 2014) http://t.co/rVoZlj6vEA -> Bombay HC clarifies first of several gray areas in Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 http://t.co/80UNTFsHfh -> Data Structure Patent Ineligible in US http://t.co/ZvVfYbVZEl -> CRTC takes action against telemarketers selling home improvement services http://t.co/dO3BGsKxvQ -> When is news reporting fair use under copyright law? [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Quoting his own separate opinion in Seila Law, LLC v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 9:16 pm
(IAM)   Australia FCA decision enforces trade marks over internet marketing of strata-titled property: Mantra Group Pty Ltd v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am by Marie Louise
Century LLC (EDTexweblog.com)   US Trade Marks – Decisions What a Betty Boop boo – part 3, the adventure continues… 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issues amended opinion in Fleischer Studios, Inc v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
(Spicy IP) Coversyl (Perindopril) – Canada: Court of Appeal upholds Trial Division finding of patent validity and infringement: Apotex v ADIR (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings) Cozaar (Losartan) – France: French Patent Office grants paediatric extension of French SPC for Losartan (The SPC Blog) Cozaar/Hyzaar (Losartan) – US: FDA prevails in generic Cozaar/Hyzaar 180-day exclusivity forfeiture litigation: Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sebelius (FDA Law Blog)… [read post]