Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 5:16 pm
Justice O’Connor, who served in a state legislature, would have known that the effects of today’s decision will be felt primarily in the states: in principle (and perhaps in practice), a single person, or small group of people, might become kingmaker, not just for a handful of important national offices, but for every major office in the country — federal, state, and local. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
California v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:00 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 7:03 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decisions regarding same-sex marriage in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:01 am
This is not surprising after Baze v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
It is not often that the United States Supreme Court hears a family law case, so the Court's June, 2011, ruling in Turner v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:45 am
State leaders felt the pressure and heard the message from their constituents that a broken public defense system has no place in the great state of New York. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Armisted v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
It would be ironic indeed if the very first time the court felt obligated to expound upon the meaning of Bush v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:25 pm
In People of the State of New York v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm
Disorderly Conduct with a Gun, State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:27 pm
Paraphrasing the Supreme Court’s decision in Riley v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
However, on review the state supreme court felt that the claim was not preempted by legislative action via the statue and the case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with its ruling. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:26 pm
In that earlier case, Coleman v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 9:54 am
Bracken v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:18 am
US v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 11:01 pm
But it was just my duty I felt to protect witnesses and grand jury information.Q. [read post]
