Search for: "FIRST STATE BANK v. HARRIS" Results 121 - 140 of 406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Maryland, where the John Marshall Supreme Court in 1819 ruled, first, that Congress had the constitutional power to create and charter the Bank of the United States, and, second, that the State of Maryland could not impose a discriminatory tax on the federal bank. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lance International, Inc. v First National City Bank, 86 AD3d 479, 480 [1st Dept 2011] [dissolved corporation lacks capacity to sue unless in the course of winding up its affairs]; cf. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Peoples First Community Bank Panama City, Florida, a.k.a. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
On the contrary, Mr Carr QC stated that issue estoppel and abuse of process are “all about justice” and noted the courts’ attempts to restrict the scope of strict action estoppel in cases such as Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93 precisely because it can lead to injustice. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
True, Jackson opposed the bank on policy grounds, but he also denied that the Supreme Court decision in McCulloch v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am by Wolfgang Demino
See image of Trustee's Deed recorded in the Harris County Clerk's Office below: FIRST THE DUNNING, THEN THE DEED Section 1692e(5) prohibits threatening to take any action that cannot legally be taken, while  Section 1692e(2) prohibits falsely representing . . . the character, amount, or legal status of any debt. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Harris, which instructs federal courts to abstain from hearing cases to enjoin ongoing state criminal proceedings. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
First National State Bank of New Jersey, 87 N.J. 163, 75-76 (1981). [read post]