Search for: "FOREST SERVICE EMPLOYEES v. US Forest Service"
Results 121 - 140
of 171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2012, 2:22 am
R. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
The project-level thresholds of significance for the San Francisco Bay Area’s GHG are: For land use developments project, compliance with a qualified GHG Reduction Strategy, or annual emissions less than 1,100 metric tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent, or 4.6 metric tons per year carbon dioxide per service population, which includes residents and employees. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 6:53 am
Rotheli v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
BMG v Cox is good, but music industry is still unhappy. [read post]
24 May 2016, 9:00 am
At its core, and in response to the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court was sensitive to just this concern when it defined religion broadly for purposes of the conscientious objector statute governing military service in the 1965 case of United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
The recent Federal Circuit case of Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Google taking the profit out of domain tasting: (The Trademark Blog), (Canadian Trademark Blog), (Class 46), (Ars Technica),ECJ rules that EU law does not force disclosure of internet users’ details in file-sharing cases in Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de… [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
In determining whether the presumption should be applied, he found that the public utility presumption has been applied only to traditional public utilities such as electricity, natural gas, telephone, and cable television services, where the employers provide an essential service directly to the public and are the only providers of that service. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
On 13 December 2021 there was an application in the misuse of private information case of Global Processing Services (UK) v Yanpolsky before Collins Rice J. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Among the plaintiffs (respondents here) were homosexual persons, some of them government employees. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
Mr Malik, and his east London-based Communities United Party, were seeking £10 million damages againstfrom the US presidential candidate for allegedly defaming Muslims living in the Green Street and Romford Road area of Forest Gate. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
.
A3208
Aubry (MS) -- Extends protection from discrimination to current employees and licensees SUMM : Amd SS750 - 753, Cor L Extends protection from discrimination to current employees and licensees; establishes written statements shall include an explanation of how the employer weighed certain factors upon denial or revocation of license or denial or termination of employment. 01/23/07 referred to correction02/13/07 reported02/22/07 advanced to third reading… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
” (Citing Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:36 am
Title690
S1325B
LANZA -- Creates the thirteenth judicial district consisting of the county of Richmond 689
S6521
MAZIARZ -- Makes provisions for the deaths or permanent or temporary disabilities of employees of voluntary hospitals in connection with the World Trade Center attacks 688
S6514
NOZZOLIO -- Relates to compensation, benefits and conditions of employment for certain state officers and employees who are members… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The words we use provide a filter through which we view and acknowledge legal concepts. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
More recently critics have seen in internationalism of CSR a profound and direct attack on state sovereignty in the service of the objectives of autonomous multilateral institutions that do not reflect local wishes. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
Vilsack, a case about whether the Fourth Amendment permitted random drug testing for Forest Service Job Corps Center employees. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:03 pm
(See, e.g., Friends of Oroville v. [read post]
