Search for: "Fails v. Virginia State Bar" Results 121 - 140 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm by cdw
The Supreme Court of Virginia’s opposite conclusion constituted an unreasonable application of federal law, as clearly established by the Supreme Court of the United States in Strickland v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 6:20 am
  Like every state except Massachusetts, New York and Texas, Virginia is a Uniform Trade Secrets Act jurisdiction, meaning that states adopting the UTSA have done so for, among other reasons, uniformity. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 8:29 am by Dwight Sullivan
Trenga of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia upheld a federal magistrate judge’s earlier ruling (United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 2:06 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Most recently, we have the Virginia Supreme Court’s decision in Radiance Capital Receivables Fourteen, LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Virginia, which involved the right to interracial marriage, and Zablocki v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
See Yelp, 770 S.E.2d at 446 (dissenting and concurring opinion) (arguing that Virginia legislature provided for exercise of subpoena power over foreign corporation that had registered agent in Virginia but concluding that evidence failed to show that corporation had sufficient contacts with Virginia for court to exercise jurisdiction); CMI, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
On review, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia held that Booking.com is not generic. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:10 pm by Jimmy Verner
State Bar of Texas Section Report - Family Law - Spring 2009 by Jimmy L. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 11:14 am by Lauren Vodopia
Justice Virginia Long (now retired from the Supreme Court and Counsel at this firm) set forth the standards for the application of the doctrine in Matsumoto v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]