Search for: "Fair v. Poole" Results 121 - 140 of 1,025
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by Florian Mueller
" Actually, the Avanci pool is an alternative option and doesn't prevent its licensors from entering into bilateral licenses (such deals have indeed ben concluded).All that Continental really wants it what it calls a "fair negotiation safe harbor. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Gary Gensler
It raises real questions about whether this structure is fair and best promotes competition. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 12:08 pm by Holly Brezee
These pools range in size from 10-20% of shares of the company on a fully diluted basis. [read post]
29 May 2022, 9:20 am by Keith Mallinson
  In the case of video standards such as AVC/H.264 the vast majority of SEPs are monetized through patent pooling. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:49 am by Hayleigh Bosher
In the US, eBay v MercExchange made it more difficult to obtain injunctions for patent infringement. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 1:31 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Coopersmith said those open court statements were so prejudicial that they tainted the pool of jurors listening and that the judge must dismiss the panel for Balwani to get a fair trial. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
”[10] With respect to Canada’s argument that the “pool” reserved for processors was not an “allocation,” the Panel pointed out that Canada’s own Notices to Importers refer fixed pools to TRQ as “allocated to processors. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:30 am by Sherry F. Colb
President & Fellows of Harvard College and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am by Alexander J. Davie
” As proposed, an illiquid fund would be defined as a fund that (i) has a limited life; (ii) does not continuously raise capital; (iii) is not required to redeem interests upon an investor’s request; (iv) has as a predominant operating strategy to return the proceeds from the disposition of investments to investors; (v) has limited opportunities, if any, for investors to withdraw before the termination of the fund; and (vi) does not routinely acquire (directly or indirectly) as… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm by Keith Mallinson
This substitute term is so vaguely defined it only sows further confusion into the already heated debate about what is and what is not Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) and legal when seeking Standard-Essential Patents (SEP) licensing. [read post]