Search for: "Farmer v. United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 922
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 4:36 am
In 1892, the Supreme Court upheld Reed’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 10:30 am
By James V. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am
” The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:35 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
State, 281 Cal. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
In 1995, the United States launched the first NAFTA trade challenge.[9] It was the first and only NAFTA Chapter 20 Canada-U.S. dispute as the agreement’s state-to-state provisions fell into disuse. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:55 pm
We have in the western United States gone from the situation where droughts occurred once every 10 or 20 years, to a situation where we never seem to leave a drought for very long before we enter into it again. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:30 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesJames Domen v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 4:42 pm
Department of Education (USDA) to consider issuing (i) new rules under the Packers and Stockyards Act making it easier for farmers to bring and win claims, stopping chicken processors from exploiting and underpaying chicken farmers, and adopting anti-retaliation protections for farmers who speak out about bad practices; (ii) new rules defining when meat can bear “Product of USA” labels, so that consumers have accurate, transparent labels that enable them to… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
In an 1838 case, Buddington v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
and 7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
and 7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.), in consultation with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, submit a report to the Chair of the White House Competition Council, enumerating and describing any relevant concerns of the Department of Agriculture and strategies for addressing those concerns across intellectual property, antitrust, and other relevant laws. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 4:46 pm
When a company or an employee leads the company’s operations from within the United States and pockets profits from human rights abuses suffered abroad, the courts in the United States must exercise jurisdiction to hold them accountable. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
United States Research and Resources Privacy by Default, Abuse by Design: EU Competition Concerns About Apple’s New App Tracking Policy, Hausfeld Competition Bulletin, Spring 2021, Thomas Hoppner and Philipp Westerhoff, Technical University Wildau and Hausfeld RA LLP. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
WATER QUALITY Clarke v. [read post]
