Search for: "Federal Cartridge Company"
Results 121 - 140
of 186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2012, 3:30 am
In 2009, because of the DMCA, a federal judge blocked RealNetworks from distributing DVD-copying software because the Seattle company’s wares employed tools that cracked the encryption on DVD videos. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 10:03 pm
It licensed its biotechnology to seed companies, and imposed licensing restrictions. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 3:33 pm
Ltd., Ninestar Technology Company Ltd., and Town Sky Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
ITC has ruled in favor of Hewlett-Packard over a patent infringement suit over the company’s inkjet print cartridges. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:40 am
Here is what it says:That every citizen so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch with a box therein to contain not less than twenty-four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball: or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
(TTABlog) SDNY: STOLICHNAYA case ends again: Federal Treasury Enter. v Spirits Int’l (Property, intangible) Reversing a 2(e)(2) geographical descriptiveness refusal, TTAB asks, where the heck is WINDHOEK? [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Hewlett-Packard Company, et. al. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:57 pm
A California federal court earlier this month rejected many of the claims in a putative class action against Epson America Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
As a former federal prosecutor, I think overturning Gonzalez would be a disaster. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:56 am
- Article courtesy of The Chicago Green Office Company [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:46 am
One of the leading decisions on that point was a 2004 federal appeals court ruling against Lexmark, which had locked its printers so only its own ink cartridges could be used. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 10:02 am
Ryan Edmundson is the named plaintiff in a proposed class action filed against Gillette in federal district court in California alleging claims under the California’s UCL and CLRA and of express warranty. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Denomination of origin granted for Machu Picchu Coffee – Huadquina (IP tango) Poland Courts note differences between wine and vodka (Class 46) Russia More fashion apparel companies seeking to register trademark in Russia (Russian Patents Blog) Switzerland The new Swiss patent litigation system (EPLAW) United Kingdom PCC Page 23: IPOff’s tentacles get some cross-examination? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 6:18 am
The company also would include on its website disclosures about "underprinting" with color ink and have instructions for how to turn that feature off. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:12 pm
Baby you CA drive my KA General Court judgment in Ford Motor Company v OHIM, Alkar Automotive, SA. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 6:19 am
The Third Circuit is particularly concerned with protecting competition when a company alleges a trade dress in an entire line of products. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:17 am
Eckard was awarded millions, because Congress designed the False Claims Act to reward whistleblowers for the risks they take when reporting companies committing fraud against the federal government. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:54 pm
’s (“APM”) motion to restrict the theories and evidence of importation that Complainants Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
Becton, Dickinson and Company, et. al. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
No. 337-TA-730 (ITC 337 Update) Hewlett-Packard – ITC issues general exclusion order and terminates investigation in Certain Inkjet Ink Supplies (337-TA-691) (ITC Law Blog) Hewlett-Packard – ITC: Summary determination of no invalidity in Certain Ink Cartridges with Printheads (337-TA-723) (ITC 337 Law Blog) Monster Cable – False marking plaintiffs’ choice of forum given little deference: Simonian v. [read post]
