Search for: "Fernandez v. Ins*"
Results 121 - 140
of 372
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2013, 3:52 am
Fernandez, decided with Brannon, id. at 600-601; People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
Because a group health plan covered room and board expenses for stays at skilled nursing facilities, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) required it to do so for residential mental health treatment facilities as well, a federal appeals court ruled in Danny P. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 6:29 am
Because a group health plan covered room and board expenses for stays at skilled nursing facilities, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA) required it to do so for residential mental health treatment facilities as well, a federal appeals court ruled in Danny P. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 5:00 am
In a "non-precedential" Memorandum decision in the case of Fernandez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Conformably with Fernandez v McDonald, that mistake, if such it was, cannot be corrected. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm
Conformably with Fernandez v McDonald, that mistake, if such it was, cannot be corrected. [read post]
22 Sep 2006, 8:43 am
Fernandez, 443 F.3d 19, 27-28 (2d Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 6:15 am
Compare Fernandez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm
Ferrer of the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 11:32 am
[The link may be busted, so I'll check back.]Jared Littrell v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:01 pm
” Rawlings v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 1:01 pm
” Rawlings v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:25 am
In Card v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 3:07 pm
Guzman-Ibarez, No. 14-50142 (Fernandez with Bea; Fisher concurring and dissenting) --- The defendant in this case had been convicted of robbery and sentenced to four years in a California state prison. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:59 am
Check it out, as well as Judge Fernandez's short dissent, the money line (pardon the pun) of which is: "When all is said and done, I would not think it was reasonable for males to strip search females in this kind of situation, and I do not think it was reasonable to have females strip search males. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:27 pm
In Fernandez-Vargas v Gonzales, the Supreme Court provided a framework for determining whether a statute should be applied retroactively. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:14 am
Bonham Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The decision, which relies heavily on two Seventh Circuit decisions, see Fernandez v. [read post]
