Search for: "Fink v. Fink" Results 121 - 140 of 205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2011, 11:29 am by Joe Palazzolo
He pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in Dirks v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "In order to prevail in an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish both that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, resulting in actual damages to the plaintiff, and that "but for" the attorney's negligence, the plaintiff would have succeeded on the merits in the underlying action or not have sustained any damages (Dupree v… [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:01 am
Heinz, 100 Jahre Walther-Schücking-Institut für Internationales Recht Jost Delbrück, Die Grenzen des Rechts – Walther Schücking und die Suche nach der lex ferenda Jasper Finke, Beyond Certainty: Experimentalism as an Answer to the I.C.J.'s Decision in Germany v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 1:56 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Anderson sat down to discuss the week’s big national security news stories including: gang warfare and political instability in Haiti, a Fifth Circuit judge’s ruling in Net Choice v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 11:55 am by Tryn T. Stimart and Jean E. Dassie
On April 26, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued a guidance, applying SAS Institute v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:41 am by Greensboro Law Blog
Questions concerning the scope of the public safety exception have also arisen.3-3:05 PM CLOSING REMARKSNOTE: Each panel will be followed by a fi fteen minute question and answer session.PARTICIPANTSThe Honorable V. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:24 am
Kaplan on Monday prevented attorneys Robert Fink and Caroline Rule from withdrawing as defense counsel to former KPMG partner Richard Smith in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 [*3]Since the remaining allegations in the complaint were flatly refuted by the defendant’s documentary evidence, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination to grant the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) to dismiss the complaint (see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 757-758; Weissman v Kessler, 78 AD3d 465, 466; Katebi v Fink, 51 AD3d 424, 425; Pacella v Whiteman Osterman… [read post]