Search for: "Fisher v. Smith" Results 121 - 140 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2012, 8:55 am
Of course, there is still that pesky little confusion test for Gucci, which in the Second Circuit is the Polaroid Crop v Polarad Elecs Corp (1961) test (see test here as applied to another famous shoe battle, Louboutin v YSL). [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 7:23 am by admin
  Not sailed so much as blown and drifting   The case is Fane Lozman v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:57 am by admin
Smith   Wheeling gulls spin and glide You’ve got no place to hide ‘Cause you don’t need one – Crosby Stills and Nash, Lee Shore   Some cases are born momentous (NFIB v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 7:04 am by Paul Horwitz
Smith did not compel defeat for the ministerial exception. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
The big news from SCOTUS this week was the acceptance of cert in Fisher v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:18 am by Legal Beagle
Buried on Page 85 of Lord Nimmo Smith’s report, it states : “The Advocate Depute telephoned the Lord Advocate, Lord Fraser, who was in London. [read post]