Search for: "Foote v. Foote"
Results 121 - 140
of 6,102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
Dept. of Commerce – and who have engineered the SEC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
The Court of Appeals (Parker, Lee and Merriam) upholds the verdict.The case is Csikos v. 230 Park South Apartments, a summary order issued on January 25. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Trump v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:13 pm
A recent New York Appellate Division, First Department case—Marte v Tishman Constr. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
Supreme Court’s 1962 decision in Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
After all, he never set foot in the Capitol (though he may have intended to). [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:03 am
The case is Saint Elizabeth Medical Center Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 3:14 pm
Coast Guard Sector Anchorage were alerted at around 4:31 p.m. on Sunday, January 21st, 2024, via VHF channel 16 that the 46-foot F/V ALASKA ROSE, was taking on water. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Rapanos v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
I might even also agree that, as a general matter, the interests of justice are often not furthered by excluding truthful and relevant evidence needed to prosecute criminals.But just as I wouldn't say that NBA players are over 6 foot tall -- since some are not -- I also wouldn't say (in a written opinion or otherwise) that the interests of justice are thwarted when truthful, relevant evidence is excluded. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
See, e.g., Schmuck v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 2:49 am
Further readingClaim interpretationBoeing's comma drama: Commas and taking the description into account when construing a claim (T 1127/16) (April 2021)Another case of catastrophic comma loss (T 1473/19): Interpreting the claims in view of the description (Jan 2023)EPO tries to have its cake and eat it on claim interpretation (T 0169/20) (March 2023)Construing the claims to include technical effects mentioned in the description (T 1924/20) (April 2023)The risk of pre-grant… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:35 pm
In each case, the permit application was denied because the sober living home violated the 650-foot separation requirement. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:49 am
The court said there was no way to enforce the 500-foot restriction. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
The Brandenburg v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 7:39 am
Regardless of the approach eventually settled on by the UPC, the decision in K-fee v Nespresso is a reminder for constant vigilance in European prosecution if patentees are to avoid shooting themselves in the foot with respect to their US patent strategy. [read post]
