Search for: "GILES V US" Results 121 - 140 of 430
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2015, 5:06 pm by Giles Peaker
The damp to the second bedroom, which could not be used for any purpose. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 12:40 pm by Giles Peaker
    The post Promises, promises by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:52 pm by Giles Peaker
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223). [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 1:38 pm by Giles Peaker
The Tribunal accepted this evidence and followed SSWP v Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) in finding that “the room had various physical features and drawbacks which prevented it from being used as a bedroom”, so it should not be counted under Reg B13. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 6:15 am by Giles Peaker
She relies on the principle established in Vinos v Marks and Spencer PLC [2000] 3 All ER 784. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 12:56 pm by Giles Peaker
The post Floating rights by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:31 pm by Giles Peaker
 Port of London Authority v Paul Mendoza [2017] UKUT 146 (TCC). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:58 am by Dennis Crouch
” One famous case is the Supreme Court’s 1884 decision in Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 1:40 pm by Giles Peaker
The post A scandal unfolds: High Court enforcement again by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:54 pm by Giles Peaker
There was some discussion before us as to what the appropriate period might be in a case such as this. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406, and Cramp v Hastings Borough Council [2005] H.L.R. 48. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 9:56 am by Giles Peaker
Large street posters board by JCDecaux were used throughout the borough from 28 January to 10 February 2014. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 7:00 am by Anna Maria Stein
The USCO emphasizes that authorship has to be limited to the creations of “human authors”, according to some US case-law dating back to 1884 (Supreme Court Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:18 am by Giles Peaker
Owens & Anor v Grose & Anor [2015] EWHC 839 (QB) As if tenancy deposits weren’t complicated enough, now we can add libel claims to the consequences of a heated deposit dispute. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Ooops. by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 2:03 pm by Giles Peaker
Alternatively please see in Gray v Taylor [1998] 1 WLR 1093. [read post]