Search for: "GIVEN v. OWEN"
Results 121 - 140
of 408
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 11:44 pm
" Rowe v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:47 am
Owen, Prosser & Keeton on Law of Torts § 114, at 818-19 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
In Spradley v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 7:25 pm
Keiser-Long v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976 [4th Dept 1988]). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:36 am
Owens last fall provides a good guidepost. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am
Mr Justice Owen in the High Court struck out the soldiers’ claims under the Human Rights Act. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:05 pm
"Jurisprudence in the United States has long held that the Pledge of Allegiance cannot be made mandatory (most recently in Lane v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
Thus he appears to have rejected Dr Owen’s view that the incident was linked to Mr Barber’s disabilities, although no reasons are given as to the basis on which this was done. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 10:54 am
And given the tenor of yesterday’s oral argument, it is difficult to believe that Duncan v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 6:16 pm
Owen v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 7:04 am
See: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201516/ldselect/ldeucom/138/138.pdf The editors believe that it is important for clarification on the Article 50 issue to be given sooner rather than later so that those entrusted with the Brexit negotiations know where they stand”. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:23 am
The Court has also issued a guidance note for the press expected to attend the hearing, with priority being given to organisations reporting for the UK, Sweden and Australia, with those reporting for the United States being given the next level of priority. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
“Where warning is given, the seller may reasonably assume that it will be read and heeded. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
Owens, 292 Ga. 380, 738 S.E.2d 56 (Georgia Supreme Court 2013).Warren v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 11:45 am
They included the fact the carrier’s route included deliveries to community centres and schools, a potential concern given the nature of the convictions. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:53 pm
Carrillo-Carrillo v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Or is it merely another instance of sloppy treatment of a consumer debt case that is considered a low priority given the small amount in controversy, compared to tort and business-vs-business cases? [read post]
