Search for: "GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION OF NON STOP PAY OUT" Results 121 - 140 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm by MOTP
  Old and Modern Harris County Courthouse  Once you (are forced  by the Texas Supreme Court to) accept the premise that the government is entitled to win in civil disputes with citizens because the government is the government -- a modern version of "The King Can Do No Wrong" -- and that it is the job of the courts to apply that principle and shut the courthouse door to victims of the government's agents it's easier to… [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-530, which addresses whether employee income from exercising stock options is taxable “compensation. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm by Marty Lederman
Yamasaki (1979)), and argues that the plaintiffs’ purported injuries would be fully redressed by an injunction limited to the identified, excluded relatives of the individual plaintiffs and to the prospective students, employees and guests of Hawaii’s colleges and universities. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:03 am by Amy Howe
Sessions (Monday, April 23): Whether, to trigger the stop-time rule for a non-permanent resident’s eligibility for cancellation of removal by serving a “notice to appear,” the government must “specify” the items listed in the definition of a “notice to appear,” including “[t]he time and place at which the proceedings will be held. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 1:48 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
  Which listeners will remember, it is a non-waivable surcharge that they put on your Driver's License if you have certain offenses. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:00 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
, means that if your goal is profit maximization you will try to figure out what people will pay and get past proxies like age and race. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm by Amy Howe
Sessions: Whether, to trigger the stop-time rule for a non-permanent resident’s eligibility for cancellation of removal by serving a “notice to appear,” the government must “specify” the items listed in the definition of a “notice to appear,” including “[t]he time and place at which the proceedings will be held. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
The Administration presumably sought the stay while the government appeals the preliminary injunction. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  TIGTA identified four FTCP violations closed in Fiscal Year (FY) 2016 that resulted in administrative actions for IRS collection employees performing collection activities. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 7:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Several of the putative intervenors argue that the consent judgment violates the governing documents and trust-related agreements, and challenge the validity of the execution of the proposed consent judgment, which was signed by a lawyer purporting to represent the Trusts, but not by the Owner Trustee. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 9:09 am by Eugene Volokh
In 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that non-union home health assistants in Illinois could not be forced to pay fees to a union. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
To avoid any confusion at all, specific examples of what constitutes sexist behaviour is provided. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:50 pm by Rick Garnett
It is unremarkably and uncontroversially “part of the deal” that if he wants to be in the business of cake creation, he can be expected, and required, to pay employees at least a particular wage, to submit his facility and equipment to regular health-and-safety inspections, and to keep records for tax purposes. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am by MOTP
" And IB had a non-delegable duty to supervise, detect, and prevent violations of its own internal policies and FINRA rules, and to prevent harm to public investors like the Parkers, as "owners" of the trust account. [read post]
They learned, too, that a person who is outed publicly as a neo-Nazi or white supremacist will sometimes pay a heavy price and suffer serious consequences.Privacy in the TwittersphereA reader might question the word “anonymous. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
B, at 16.The language in the contracts indicates that Plaintiff may recover attorney's fees incurred in pursuing its claims, insofar as such recovery does not violate the Texas Constitution. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Adriana S. Kosovych
  Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that after the restaurant stopped serving the public and the closing shift ended, employees were required to clock out and continue working until the restaurant was fully cleaned and all work was completed. [read post]