Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 121 - 140 of 3,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2020, 8:03 am by Amy Howe
Border-wall funding The decision to grant review in Trump v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Unlawful obstruction of justice through bribery of judicial officers; corruption and bribery of heads of government departments or members of the Congress in the United States, or Ministers of the Crown or members of Parliament in New Zealand; corruption and bribery of law enforcement officers or government officials; fabrication of evidence; conspiracy to bring false accusation; corrupting juries and witnesses by threats, bribes, or other corrupt means. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARBITRATION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND FRANCE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF FRANCE, being desirous to confirm their friendly relations and to promote the cause of justice, have resolved to conclude a new treaty for the extradition of fugitives from justice, and have appointed for that purpose the following plenipotentiaries: THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: His Excellency,… [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Much of the argument focused on precisely this question, causing the justices to explore the meaning of the word "adjacent," as the Court previously upheld the EPA and Army Corps' authority over wetlands adjacent to navigable waters in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
  Only the federal government, the Justice Department argued, can make immigration policy. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:05 pm by James Nicholas
On June 16, 2017, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) changed its position with respect to the enforceability of class action waivers in the labor and employment context. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 11:14 am by Amy Howe
Sotomayor also observed that there has been a long history in the United States of states not wanting to fund churches; they should be free to do that in cases like this. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:14 am
 The decision, written by Justice Scalia on behalf of a five justice majority, departs from decades of precedent from the United States Courts of Appeals that allowed such claims to be brought when substantial aspects of the misconduct occurred in the United States or when the misconduct had a substantial effect on U.S. investors. [read post]