Search for: "Gallagher v. Attorney General" Results 121 - 140 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Feb. 12, 2010)(per curiam)(petition abated, findings of fact requested from trial court, scope of release pursuant to settlement at issue)GALLAGHER HEADQUARTERS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD., CHRIS HILL AND JULIE HOOPER v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am by INFORRM
It was clear from the questions put to the Guardian’s main barrister Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC that one of the questions the Master of the Rolls, Sir Geoffrey Vos was particularly concerned about was the role played in the proceedings by the Attorney General. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
As noted in our events section below, the Attorney General will speak at City University London on 1 December. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Olson, the renowned attorneys who notably faced-off in Bush v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am by Dennis Crouch
  Chao was a patent attorney and patent litigator for 20 years before becoming a professor and I have long valued his insight. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm by Reference Staff
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 2:25 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
  Here is an excerpt: “In early February 2012, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:23 pm
Recognizing the strain this placed on the attorney-client relationship, in Knorr-Bremse v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:10 am
New York's attorney general subpoenaed Thain last month in connection with his office's investigation into the timing of the bonuses. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
P. 60(b)(6); (4) whether a reasonable jurist could believe that the Texas Attorney General made material misrepresentations that constitute a fraud on the court; (5) whether imposition of the death penalty in this case was arbitrary and capricious. [read post]