Search for: "Gant v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 556
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2011, 4:05 am
State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:41 am
[The court notes Gant "calls into question the continued viability of New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2003, 10:43 am
Gant (involving the Belton search rule for cars, an issue on which the Court had previously granted cert.);02-1183, United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
But see State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:21 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:14 am
The state court held that Gant could not have reached his car during the search and posed no safety threat to the officers, making a vehicle search unreasonable under the “reaching-distance rule” of New York v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:47 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:19 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 10:32 am
In the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 9:32 am
In the recent United States Supreme Court decision, Arizona v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 1:41 pm
The post State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 4:50 am
The Eleventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:12 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 7:02 am
In light of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Arizona v Gant, 556 U.S. ___, 129 S Ct 1710, 173 L Ed 2d 485 (2009), which abrogated the well-established rule in New York v Belton, 453 U.S. 454; 101 S Ct 2860; 69 L Ed 2d 768 (1981) and its progeny, we must consider whether an officer's good faith reliance on case law that is later overturned may form a proper basis to avoid the operation of the exclusionary rule. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Last year the Supreme Court held in Arizona v. [read post]
