Search for: "Garbs v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2010, 7:23 am
In People v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
The subject of this little rant was the dispute in Hudson Bay Apparel Brands LLC v Umbro International Ltd. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:09 pm
Link: San Francisco ChronicleLink: United States v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 pm
Most people viewed the newspaper photo of her wearing such garb as a high school student as quaint and prescient. [read post]
15 May 2010, 4:10 am
In a 1980 case, Vance v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:59 am
Lord Neuberger then listed 7 reasons why he found there was the requisite close connection: (a) Father Clonan was normally dressed in clerical garb, and was so dressed, when he first met the claimant and was referred to as “Father” he purported to have a degree of moral authority through this role. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
The other categories of citizens, in terms of the Constitutional scheme, are Part III, Part IV, Article 311 and Part V. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm
Though it facially discriminates against religious practices, it was nonetheless upheld against a Free Exercise Clause challenge, in Cooper v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm
In Brooks v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
The House of Lords in Begum, R (on the application of) v Denbigh High School [2006] UKHL 15, [2007] 1 Appeal Cases 100 dealt with Article 9 and Article 2 of Protocol 1 under the European Convention in the case of a schoolgirl who was prevented from a more extensive garb that had longer sleeves than the school uniform. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:15 pm
The Queen (on the Application of AB) v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:38 pm
It should also be noted that, although the Association initially lost its tax exemption, the State of New Jersey reinstated the Association's exemption from property tax for the beach and the rest of the boardwalk, but stated that it could not continue to exempt the pavilion as it was not truly open to the public. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 12:08 pm
Glenn v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 6:15 pm
In Webb v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Mary Queen of the Third Millennium, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
"
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:57 am
John v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 11:17 am
In State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:30 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 1:44 pm
In his comment to my post regarding the "PRS Conference on Effective Legislatures-Part 1", Venkatesan has rightly pointed out that as per the Supreme Court's judgment in Common Cause (A Registered Society) v. [read post]
