Search for: "Gavin v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 5:40 am
Christopher Coleman, the husband of Sheri and the father of Garett and Gavin, was charged with and subsequently convicted of the murders. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am by Eric Goldman
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 6:11 am by Caroline Ncube
Rajah disputes this allegation and states that he created his gown independently and without ever having had sight of Murad's gown. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
The judge based his ruling on the two-part test from the US Supreme Court decision last year in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
Despite this, California Governor Gavin Newsom began favoring a hardline approach to homelessness in California in 2022. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
Today the court hears oral argument in Dean v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am by INFORRM
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:52 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image by Getty Images via @daylifeIn Tesla Motors, Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 7:02 am by Jeremy Meisinger
” While both the CPPA and Newsom phrased their opposition in terms of consumer protection, it is hard to consider the fraught state/federal privacy dynamic without also considering the privacy chaos unleashed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]