Search for: "General Electric Company, a Corporation v. the United States"
Results 121 - 140
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
EPA's proposed regulation that requires states to dramatically restructure their electricity systems based on how the agency thinks electricity should be produced and used in each state. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Shamokin Filler Company, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:17 am
As FBI Director James Comey eloquently put it, “There are two kinds of big companies in the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:58 am
(Entergy Servs, Inc v OFCCP, December 22, 2014, EDLa, dkt nos 14-1524 and 14-1644) The federal contractor group involved in these two consolidated actions consists of subsidiaries of Entergy Corporation (collectively, “Entergy”), including lead plaintiff Entergy Services, Inc, a Delaware corporation headquarted in New Orleans, that provides administrative services for Entergy Corporation and some of the Entergy subsidiaries. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 1:22 pm
”[2]However, as a matter of law in the United States and Bangladesh, Apparel Mart and the Bangladeshi companies are each viewed as separate legel entities, each wholly responsible for its own activities. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
” (Tracy First v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Flying somewhat below the radar, the on-going case of Indiana Electrical Workers Pension Trust Fund IBEW v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 4:40 am
P’ship v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
In Codex Corporation v Racal-Milgo Ltd [1983] RPC 369 at page 381, the Court of Appeal held that one should not look only to the essence or principle of a patent in suit to find an infringement merely because the essence or principle has been made use of by the alleged infringer. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
State of California (2014) 224 Cal.App.4th 1542. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:45 pm
NSK Corporation v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:05 am
As you know from the outcry over the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling, the free speech clause also protects corporations. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
We are inclined to agree with Chief Justice Rehnquist’s dissenting opinion in Pacific Gas and Electric Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
WEBRE, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF TEXAS UNITED CORPORATION AND UNITED SALT CORPORATION, No. 12-0045 : This petition raises several questions about shareholder suits in closely held corporations. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:28 am
In particular, Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
CITGO Asphalt Refining Company v. [read post]
