Search for: "Givens v. Miller" Results 121 - 140 of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 9:41 am
The test for obscenity, laid out in the 1973 Supreme Court case of Miller v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:32 am by INFORRM
  The judgment was given in the course of a costs assessment in a libel case brought by businessman Andrew Miller against the Daily Mail arising out of an article published on 2 October 2008. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 11:53 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: JAMES HENRY and BARBARA HENRY, Husband and Wife, v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am by INFORRM
In the case of Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood; Miller v Associated Newspapers Ltd; and, Frost and others v MGN Ltd ([2017] UKSC 33), the defendant media organisations each brought an appeal to the Supreme Court in relation to the obligation that they pay additional liabilities in cases engaging their right to freedom of expression. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
Most attention was given to the statement read by actress Sienna Miller, which made a number of allegations against The Sun for what was described as “prolonged” and “substantial” phone hacking, and leaking news that Ms Miller was pregnant. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am by Blog Editorial
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58:  The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on whether it has… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
The inquiry is always in two stages, namely computation and distribution;”iv) The House of Lords in White v White [2001] AC 596 and Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 has given guidance as to the approach and principles to be applied in the exercise of the statutory discretion conferred by the MCA 1973.v) That guidance makes it clear that the court is to have regard to, and apply, the relevant statutory… [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 2:02 am by Sir Paul Jenkins QC (Hon)
A short case comment on R (Miller & Anor) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union & Ors [2016] EWHC 2768 (Admin), which will likely be appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Blog Editorial
 Lord Kerr (massively paraphrased): but has Parliament has not given citizens of the UK rights by way of the 1972 Act, and therefore would have to be consulted in order for them to be taken away? [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:18 am by Kayla Campbell
Apr. 29, 2020) (applying exceptions to the exhaustion requirement given the risk of severe health consequences if delays in relief should occur); Miller v. [read post]