Search for: "Glasscock v. Glasscock"
Results 121 - 140
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2019, 6:21 am
The frequently discussed but generally unwritten story underlying the three judicial opinions in Verition Partners v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
In Frechter v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
Glasscock and Mr. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 7:37 am
Vice Chancellor Glasscock found evidence that several high-ranking Nuveen bond specialists warned Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank and J.P. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:00 am
Sept. 15, 2015); Acevedo v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 6:53 pm
Gary’s advancement right As to Gary’s right to advancement, Vice Chancellor Glasscock noted that Gary was not an executive and thus did not need to get Series D approval. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Showell v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 4:38 am
Co-author Carolina Cuppitelli* The question presented in Aaron v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker Jatex Oil & Gas, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 10:25 am
RevolutionWear, Inc., July 19, 2016, Glasscock, S.). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:03 am
Sagerman, November 19, 2015, Glasscock, S.). [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P., June 24, 2016, Glasscock, S.).Merger mechanics. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 3:38 am
Holder of Invalidly Issued Shares Denied Inspection of Books and Records Pogue v Hybrid Energy, Inc., C.A. 111563-VCG [Del. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Finally, the newest member of the Court, Vice Chancellor Glasscock, discussed “poison pills” and in particular Chancellor Chandler’s February 15, 2011 decision in Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:20 am
Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 6:29 am
Glasscock v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:25 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 10:41 am
Marchand v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:08 am
Last week, the Delaware Court of Chancery rejected a motion to dismiss in Teamsters Local 443 Health Services & Insurance Plan v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 7:48 am
In City of Cambridge Retirement System v. [read post]
