Search for: "Goes v. Perry"
Results 121 - 140
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Perry and McCreary County v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:03 pm
Katy Perry’s “War,” they’ve sent over 300 takedown notices for the same site to Google. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
Yesterday the Court heard argument in Lawson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
This goes to the weight of the evidence, not foundation. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
News South Africa http://t.co/vTAbTl2WSm -> Verizon’s bid to kill network neutrality law goes to court Monday http://t.co/sn9MZXE1su -> Discovery to obtain IP addresses in bitTorerrent case permitted POUNDS PICTURES. v DOES 1-17, ED Tenn 2013http://t.co/IAgXsl4g2e -> Link to American Institute of Physics v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:30 am
News South Africa http://t.co/vTAbTl2WSm -> Verizon’s bid to kill network neutrality law goes to court Monday http://t.co/sn9MZXE1su -> [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
FX goes after retailer for trademark over iconic X-ringhttp://t.co/nTRFcStpU0 -> Aereo fighting to avoid injunction – it's only a matter of time http://t.co/cbS8l8TEP0 -> Osler law firm develops fair dealing guidelines for AUCC http://t.co/NL0zxa54Oa -> Fox v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
FX goes after retailer for trademark over iconic X-ringhttp://t.co/nTRFcStpU0 -> Aereo fighting to avoid injunction – it's only a matter of time http://t.co/cbS8l8TEP0 -> Osler law firm develops fair dealing guidelines for AUCC http://t.co/NL0zxa54Oa -> Fox v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:48 am
Earlier this month, in Eastwood Investors V, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Crumpled paper copyright claim dismissed Rains v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm
The case of Perry v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
· As Goes Access to Law School, So Goes Access to Justice – Part II . . . [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
As I explained in an earlier column: Under [a very plausible reading of the relevant cases,] the law of the Ninth Circuit (and perhaps also that of the Supreme Court) [suggests that] a district judge has no power, outside of a class action setting, to order relief that goes beyond protecting the named plaintiffs to also protect other would-be plaintiffs, unless full relief cannot be given to the named plaintiffs without also necessarily regulating the defendants’ interactions… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
Stone v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
Perry, but I cannot celebrate the reasoning. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
Stone v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
Stone v. [read post]
