Search for: "Goff v. Goff"
Results 121 - 140
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 2:28 pm
Mr Justice Eder held that the correct approach was that the present legislation is presumed valid but, as stated by Lord Goff in Kirklees BC v Wickes Building Supplies Ltd [1993] AC 227, the existence of the alleged defence is to be taken into account in the exercise of the court’s discretion [paragraph 78]. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:25 am
The Court referred to Lord Goff’s statement in Smith v Littlewoods Ltd., [1987] AC 241, that there is in general no duty imposed on a person to prevent third parties causing damage to another. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:43 am
Supreme Court has announced that it will hear Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:49 am
The case, Flava Works, Inc v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:42 am
Barr v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:05 am
This is a shortened version of an article published by Rosalind English in the Journal of Environmental Law and Management November 2011: Cooperation and Public Goods: an evolutionary perspective on environmental law 23 ELM 278-283 In my 2011 post Why be nice? [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:00 am
Tugendhat J gave a decision on that application (Cairns v Modi [2010] EWHC 2859 (QB)), holding that the figure of between 35 and 100 Twitter readers agreed between the experts did not prevent there being a real and substantial tort. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:12 am
The deadline for the paperwork was coming up soon but the actual hearing itself won’t be until August.2: US High Court Won't Hear Copyright Suit Against Google On Nude PhotosNext up today, the Perfect 10 v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
Louis-area opera company, the recent Supreme Court ruling in the case Golan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 10:06 pm
There is a failure of consideration if B has not “rendered” to A what the advance was paid for (see Lord Goff’s speech in Stocznia Gdanska v Latvian). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:12 pm
A child who has posed for a camera must go through life knowing that the recording is circulating within the mass distribution system for child pornography.13 The Court reaffirmed this truism in Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:19 am
The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:51 am
Judge Slaps Around Brazilian Court In Zynga v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:09 am
The court, ruling in the case of John Wiley & Sons Inc v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:50 am
The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:24 pm
In Goff v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:57 pm
Today was an up-and-down day for many people. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 5:47 pm
Although the theory that a court merely declares pre-existing law has been described by no less an authority than Lord Browne-Wilkinson as a “fairy tale in which no one any longer believes”, it is clear, as Lord Goff noted (Kleinwort Benson v Lincoln City Council), that retrospectivity of decisionmaking is inevitable in a system that is committed to the doctrine of precedent. [read post]
