Search for: "Golden v. State of California"
Results 121 - 140
of 586
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
-Portland 1.72 $93,755 $54,500 Florida State Univ. 1.73 $81,159 $47,000 Univ. of Notre Dame 1.73 $130,589 $75,500 Univ. of Washington-Seattle 1.74 $109,405 $63,000 Univ. at Buffalo 1.75 $90,928 $52,100 Univ. of California-Irvine 1.75 $119,986 $68,700 Univ. of Akron Main 1.75 $73,756 $42,200 Michigan State Univ. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:05 am
Regents of the University of California (the DACA case). [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:51 am
Now, the latest from Nokia v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 10:35 am
Notably, while the cases above mostly expand tort liability, the Golden State has been at the vanguard of the opposite, too. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:07 pm
In a joint letter, we ask the California Supreme Court to grant a hearing in the case Golden Door Properties, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
For example, in Golden State Transit Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 1:08 pm
Marshall v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 6:26 am
The court in Golden v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
(See Stackla, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
(See Stackla, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 10:51 pm
Relatively speaking, the Southern District of California would apparently have been the only alternative in the Golden State, but then Avanci would have had to place the emphasis on Qualcomm, which is a key Avanci member and certainly has a strong interest in this case, though Nokia is more relevant. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
” In 2015, the Ninth Circuit decided Golden v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
” For generations since, first-year contracts professors have used Lumley v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm
Women-to-men earnings in the Golden State has ranged from about 83 percent (in 2001) to nearly 91 percent in 2005. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 5:02 pm
Employment attorneys in Orange County recognize this decision handed down by the court could have a significant impact on both employers and workers in the Golden State. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
The applicable statute of limitations, borrowed from state law, was four years. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Credorax (USA), Inc., 164 So. 3d at 722; Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
Credorax (USA), Inc., 164 So. 3d at 722; Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:29 pm
The Golden State is considered more plaintiff-friendly than most on these issues, but that doesn’t mean any worker will have an easy time of it. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:53 am
Employers in the Golden State are well aware that last year in Dynamex v. [read post]
