Search for: "Goode v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 121 - 140
of 344
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
The definition of ‘good cause’ in Social Security Commissioners Decision R(S) 2/63(T) expressly approved. it reads: In Decision C.S 371/49, the Commissioner said “”good cause” means in my opinion, some fact which, having regard to all the circumstances (including the claimant’s state of health and the information he had received and which he might have obtained) would probably have… [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
Yet the Order covers all "posting about Petitioners on any social media service, website, discussion board, or similar outlet or service. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 4:14 pm
The Press Gazette had a piece “Transparency concerns over BBC rehiring of Bashir but decision made ‘in good faith’, review finds”. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
Guardianship Estate of Keffeler, which interpreted a statute protecting Social Security benefits from "execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
Mullin’s investigative journalism helped secure the release of six men wrongly convicted for the attacks in 1991. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) statement can be read here. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:57 pm
You may recall from the Privacy Commissioner's investigation of Nexopia that the kid-focused social networking site retained information indefinitely, at least in part, in case the police asked for it. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:44 am
Building in part on that work, the Office of the High Commissioner has recently announced the convening of an expert workshop on 21-22 February 2018, to discuss the role and contribution of civil society organizations, academia, national human rights institutions and other relevant stakeholders in the prevention of human rights abuses. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:19 pm
(b) Commissioner. -- "Commissioner" means a District Court commissioner appointed in accordance with Article IV, § 41G of the Maryland Constitution. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
In truth Campbell had appeared on talk show Good Morning Britain and said “The offence with which [Epstein] was charged and for which he was imprisoned, was ‘soliciting prostitution from minors’. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Wallis, MD Florida 2013http://t.co/7psHtlPOaz -> TRO granted to prevent open sourcing of infringing software BATTELLE ENERGY v SOUTHFORK SECURITY Idaho 2013http://t.co/b68D3Uw6mY -> Hosting agreement terminated for customer spamming AHOSTING, INC. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 5:30 am
Acanac Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case, TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
Since the landmark case of Jones v. [read post]
