Search for: "Google Corporation and YouTube Corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 2:36 pm by James Kachmar
Unless you’ve been living in a cave, you likely have visited YouTube, which is owned by Google LLC. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 5:00 am by Jed Rubenfeld
It may be tempting to think of Facebook and YouTube as public forums. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 5:39 pm by Tom Smith
Meanwhile, YouTube—owned by Google—bans content creators who express opinions Google’s employees and leaders disagree with. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:49 am by Editor Charlie
” Even armed with that corporate knowledge, Google gave a big thumbs-up to what they clearly recognized as theft, and went ahead and bought YouTube for 1.65 billion dollars. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 4:18 am by INFORRM
But let’s make that part of a bigger conversation about information architecture, and how much of it should be ceded to corporate interests. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:52 pm
Reviewing every comment under the millions of videos on YouTube - and in a multiplicity of languages - and in real or near real time - is impossible. [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 2:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Google also raised eyebrows when it admitted that it paid tax of less than 1/10% in the UK: the company is said to have generated $18 billion in revenue from the U.K. over a five year period beginning 2006 and paid only $16 million in corporate taxes. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:48 am by INFORRM
It is also not clear whether closing down its search function would affect other Google offerings, such as Google Maps, Youtube etc. or if Australians could continue nonetheless to access Google offerings outside Australia, possibly by using Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) to skirt any geo-blocking imposed by Google. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 5:29 pm by Chris Castle
Google needed an industrial-strength booster for its business because smartphones, especially the iPhone, were relentlessly eating its corporate lunch. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 3:27 pm
YOUTUBE and GOOGLE YouTube and Google's motion starts off by explaining the meritorious and important public function of YouTube's activities - specifically that it is "prominent source of political information". [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 4:53 am
Plaintiff Max Sound Corporation ("Max Sound") filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") against three defendants: Google, Inc., YouTube, LLC and On2 Technologies (collectively, "Defendants"), for the infringement of Patent No. 7,974,339 (the "'339 patent"). [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 12:45 pm by Cory Doctorow
Google's comparatively modest version of an Article 13 filter, the YouTube ContentID system, cost $60 million to develop and tens of millions more to maintain, and it can only compare videos to a small database of copyright claims from a trusted group of rightsholders. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:00 am by Brent Lorentz
  It appears that Google is taking seriously it’s changed corporate motto, which went from the passive “Don’t Be Evil,” to the active “Do the Right Thing” at the same time Google changed its corporate structure and put everything under the Alphabet umbrella. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:53 pm
The implications per Stone: ...the deal[s] will give Cisco the technology to help large corporate clients create services resembling MySpace or YouTube to bring their customers together online. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 9:33 am by Chris Castle
Not to mention ten years of information Google has scraped from Content ID on YouTube or sheet music on Google Books. [read post]
3 May 2007, 4:02 pm
The lawsuit follows closely on the heels of Viacom’s recent copyright infringement suit against Google (which we’ve spilled pixels on here, here, here and here), and contains allegations similar to Viacom’s: namely, that Google, the owner of YouTube, violated federal copyright law by posting video clips on YouTube without authorization. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:35 am by Thomas P. Gulick
Maybe the decision involving parent company Google in the book settlement case has YouTube a little more concerned. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
It doesn’t matter how old episodes of The Simpsons are: They don’t belong to ECOTtotal, they don’t belong to YouTube or Google, not even to Krusty the Clown. [read post]