Search for: "Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Grounds" Results 121 - 140 of 316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Slip op. at 12 (citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  With the increased focus on sexual harassment in the news, the apparent increased willingness by employees to report such behavior, and a climate where state and local governments are stepping up to support the movement, employers (including directors and officers) and insurers should recognize that an increase in sexual harassment claims and lawsuits may be inevitable. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:54 pm
" Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
Sierra Railway Co. (1907) 151 Cal. 113, 115 [plaintiff is entitled to “[s]uch reasonable sum . [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
” In the second post, Louise Melling focuses on the lawsuits by various institutions across the country challenging the requirement that they include prescription birth control in the insurance provided to their employees as violating their religious freedom. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Felix Manufacturing Inc., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]