Search for: "Grant v. Commissioner of Correction "
Results 121 - 140
of 482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
Nevertheless, the GDPR has also some serious flaws. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Below is the "Introduction" to The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - A 645 page e-book reviewing the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions to be considered in a layoff of personnel in the event of a layoff by the State of New York as the employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
Below is the "Introduction" to The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - A 645 page e-book reviewing the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions to be considered in a layoff of personnel in the event of a layoff by the State of New York as the employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
The judge discharged injunctions that he had granted against Persons Unknown based on the principles derived from the decision of the Court of Appeal in Canada Goose [2020] EWCA Civ 303. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
; · Molly Burich, Director of Public Policy, Boehringer Ingelheim · Surya Singh, President, Singh Healthcare Advisors, LLC Moderated Panel Discussion Meredyth Andrus, Attorney, Health Care Division, Bureau of Competition, FTC Does the designation of interchangeability still have value in the US? [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 1:49 pm
” — Kristina Littman, as newly appointed SEC Cyber Chief in her 2020 breakout enforcement action, SEC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Parry & Ors was heard on Thursday 31 October. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Certiorari was granted in February 2019. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 4:08 pm
In the case of Young v Racing NSW [2019] NSWDC 662 Gibson DCJ struck out a claim for defamation and negligence claim. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
On 4 November 2019 Saini J heard an application in the case of ABC v Google LLC. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:08 am
See Ferri v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 7:10 am
The Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Lucia v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
; Many rural interest groups have publicly called for continued funding for the program. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am
The factors a Data Controller in Google’s position are required to consider were considered and discussed by the English High Court in ;NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (see our blog here). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Clayton County, GA (No. 17-1618) and Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm
; what interests does that law grant? [read post]
