Search for: "Graves v. District of Columbia"
Results 121 - 128
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 3:35 am
Por otra parte, el Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos determinó en junio de 2008 que la Segunda Enmienda de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos protege un derecho individual a tener y portar armas que está ligado a la auto-preservación del individuo en District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
They closed up Wall Street—the financial district of the world, and they had total domination. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
When a firm seeks to use ESG principles in its business operations and/or investing decisions, it may do so by providing public disclosures, statements, or claims related to the following types of criteria: Environmental: Information related to, inter alia, energy efficiencies, water usage, water and ground pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, impact on biodiversity and deforestation, use of recycled or renewable materials, or a product’s cradle-to-grave lifecycle. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:45 am
There is much to pore over in last week’s release by the Director National Intelligence. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm
Remediation matters.[12] DOJ has consistently emphasized the importance of companies’ efforts to proactively identify misconduct, provide restitution, and implement compliance programs.[13] Companies should do everything possible to adjust their internal investigations to DOJ’s priorities and remove any obstacles to the DOJ inquiry.[14] Companies need to be aware that if DOJ finds that the company is culpable for grave misconduct, even complete cooperation may not be enough to… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:20 am
For example, Lash, in discussing the question of ratifiers' views on "whether Section Three applied to future insurrections," states (at 45) that "[v]ery few ratifiers specifically addressed" the question, but those who did "came to different conclusions" on this point. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
Notwithstanding these potentially grave consequences; notwithstanding the fact that most experts now view cyber-attacks to be inevitable; and notwithstanding the pervasive nature of the risk, most corporate boards fail to allocate to cybersecurity the same level of oversight routinely afforded to the area of financial reporting. [read post]
