Search for: "Gunn v. Over"
Results 121 - 139
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 5:45 am
Gunn, M.D. and Obstretical and Gynecological Associates, P.A., No. 09-0942 (DDB). [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 5:10 am
Over the past two months, I published a two-part article on the consolidation vs. severance issue in Post-Koken cases in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly, a statewide legal publication. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 8:57 am
Small correction to an opinion on rehearing Leila Regenia Brown Hidalgo v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:01 am
One case (Parker v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 9:01 am
One case (Parker v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 8:45 pm
(IP tango) Europe IP work disrupted by volcano (Managing Intellectual Property) When the dog expires - General Court decision in Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd v OHIM (IPKat) Questions emerge over undisclosed terms of new EPO president’s contract (IAM) OHIM’s case law review for 2009 now available (Class 46) Gala and Golden Delicious share latest GI (Class 46) Bad Kissinger gets no GI protection as Commission strikes out German mass application (IPKat)… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:40 am
187/08, Rodd & Gunn Australia Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, was posted on the Curia website this morning, confirming that this is an inauspicious day for dogs, trade mark attorneys, CPA and Antipodeans.Back in July 1998 a New Zealand business, Specialty Brands Ltd, secured registration of the doggie sign on the right as a Community trade mark for goods in Classes 16, 18 and 25. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
Another interesting nugget: Though Roe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:02 am
Gunn Similarly, in Minton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
A party seeking those remedies must charge conduct that is consumer oriented, with an impact on the public at large (Canario v Gunn, 300 AD2d 332 [*2][2002]). [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 3:10 am
Stanton Wettick in the case of Gunn v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am
Gunn v. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm
Gunn v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 3:17 pm
In Minton v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:41 pm
(consolidation permitted of bad faith action against UIM carrier and declaratory judgment action regarding coverage).Gunn v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 7:46 am
Gunn Law Group, P.A. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 9:21 pm
Per Gunn v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:18 pm
Kahle v. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Chairman Battista, in finding that the Respondent unlawfully refused to hire the nine discriminatees, relied solely on credited testimony that the Respondent's owner John Gunn, its General Manager Glynn Smith, and its Manager Anthony Soto made several statements evidencing animus to DHL's Manager Hugo Moya, Act Fast Supervisor Omar Juarez, and former Act Fast employee Margarito Garcia. [read post]
