Search for: "HALE v. RECORD."
Results 121 - 140
of 266
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
’ Hale v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
A few weeks ago, the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down an interesting decision in Baskin v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
Supreme Court The appeal will be heard today by a panel of five judges comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Toulson. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
That may be because the effect of Baroness Hale’s February 2011 decision in ZN Tanzania [2011] UKSC 4 had not been absorbed. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am
See, Ari v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm
The result in Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
A traditional trust is not a distinct legal entity at all, but rather a “fiduciary relationship” that could not be haled into court. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Here’s a nice personal jurisdiction decision (TV Azteca v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
The assignment was recorded in the Summit County Recorder’s Office September 28, 2010. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Of interest to constitutional lawyers, the Court embarked upon a detailed consideration of an earlier decision in Quark Fishing Ltd v UK, App. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
” Supreme Court The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Dyson, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson on the 12 and 13 October 2015. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 2:16 am
Lady Hale would have allowed the appeal under the Wednesbury challenge. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
See Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 1:00 am
Most recently of all, in Nicklinson (Nicklinson and Lamb v the United Kingdom), the ECtH [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:38 am
A delicious example of a brilliant judge taking a close look at a case and dismissing it for not passing muster is Mladenov v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Clarke (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Sumption agreed) gave judgment for the majority, finding that the policy of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (“PSNI”) to indefinitely retain the biometric data of adults convicted of recordable offences was proportionate. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:15 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
The press must be free to expose the truth and put the record straight’ ([151]). [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:24 am
The entire panel agreed, however, that summary judgment was properly granted on her public policy wrongful discharge claim since she failed to show that a state regulation setting forth baseline recordkeeping requirements for pharmacies mirrored the state whistleblower law or that she ever reported a violation (Hale v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Toulson had no such qualms. [read post]
